Carl Hosein is a licensed immigration consultant with over 27 years experience in Refugee LawRefugee law can be complex and requires experience in planning and executing for success.
Mr Hosein has represented various clients before the IRB with a good proven track record. Specific to Religious persecution., women’s rights and sexual orientation.
Based on practical country research and research from extensive International sources, Mr. Hosein has the knowledge and expertise to successfully represent your care before the IRB.
We are also very sensitive to religious and cultural issues
SERVICES PROVIDED.
A) Thorough scrutiny of the claim for protection
B) Legal research and analysis of the claim in regards to current country condition
C) Apply country condition and persecution to the specific claim.
D) Current precedent cases and ongoing persecution in source country, CREDIBILITY INTERNAL FLIGHT ALTERNATIVE ( IFA) DELAYED CLAIM FAILURE TO CLAIM
RETURN TO THIRD SAFE COUNTRY
E) . Made claim online, or prepare clients for PORT OF ENTRY CLAIM
F) Acknowledgment of claim and IFHP.
G) Medical Exam
H) WORK PERMIT AND EXTENSION.
I). Schedule for biometrics and submit identity docs, birth certificates etc. Accountability for claimants entering Canada without proper identity
.J) Schedule for Eligibility Interview. After being eligible for refugee protection claimant document and confirmation of referral to IRB.
K) Ongoing consultation for documentation preparation for supporting the hearing at a later date
L) Review of BOC for comparative study of documentation support
M) Full preparation of claimant for hearing
N) Final review of file for accuracy and claimant readiness
O) Application for permanent resident
P) Provide full support to claimant to explain the hearing process to assist in emotionally dealing with the hearing
Q) judicial review
R) Removals Hearings
S) Deportations…..PRRA
T) Humanitarian and Compassionate applications
The hearing process is very court-like and legalistic, despite efforts to make it informal. To be accepted as Convention refugees, claimants are required to prove that they had a well-founded fear of persecution based on one of the five grounds listed in the 1951 United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees [1
Because of the potentially complex legal issues involved and the need to make sure that all critical points are addressed in the BOC
claimants are encouraged to seek professional counsel.
Many of the respondents felt strongly that the person who is representing the claimant at the hearing must also be actively involved in preparing the claimant for the hearing.
We ensure and spend countless hours ensuring support and review of documentation, psychological assessments
medical reports, police reports, current country conditions specific to the claim
The respondents who felt that representation is needed at expedited process interviews posited a number of different reasons. Some felt that there is a need for someone to monitor the questions being asked, to intervene when necessary to clarify any misunderstanding that might arise, and to make sure that salient points in the claimant’s story are not overlooked. They see this role as especially important in situations where claims not accepted in the expedited process are remitted for a full hearing following the interview. When this happens, notes from the interview form part of the record at the hearing. According to these respondents, a representative is needed at the interview since most claimants would not be aware of the need to place objections or comments on the record. Other respondents noted that the presence of a representative whom the claimant knows and trusts is needed to put claimants at ease so they can function effectively at the expedited process interview.
The situation with regard to post-determination options available to unsuccessful refugee claimants has changed significantly over the months that research for this study was carried out. Prior to June 28, 2002, when the IRPA came into force, any claimant whose refugee claim was rejected by the Convention Refugee Determination Division (CRDD) of the IRB could, within 15 days after receiving notice of that decision, apply to CIC to be considered for inclusion in the post-determination refugee claimants in Canada class (PDRCC
— With regard to judicial review, respondents in all categories were unanimous in the view that representation by legal counsel is an absolute necessity
and is reserved for members of the Law Society.
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/claim-protection-inside-canada/apply.html
CONDITION IN INDIAWhile there were 325 asylum claims from peoples born in India in 2016, that number rose to nearly 5,000 in 2019 for Quebec. India has now become the No. 1 country of origin for asylum seekers arriving in the province, far ahead of Mexico, Nigeria, Colombia, Haiti or Congo, Feb 11, 2021.
Read MoreIRB – Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada.This Response was prepared after researchingpublicly accessible information currently available to the research Directorate within time constraints.This Response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim for refugee protection.
India: Situation and treatment of Muslims, Including in Hyderabad: available of state protection; ability of Muslims to relocate and access hosting, employment, education and healthcare, including in Hyderabad (2017- June 2020) [IND200257.E]Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
Overview
OverviewSources report that Muslims are the largest religious mintority group in India (CSSS) and MRG June 2017, 5: Time 3 Mar.2002; AP 25Apr. 2020). According to the latest national census in 2011, there were approximately 172.2 million Muslims in the country (India 2011). They accounted
Read MoreDetails
A report by the telangana state government Indicates that based on the 2011 census, approximately 12.7 percent of residents in the Telangana state were Muslims (Telangana Aug.2016,2). Based on the 2011 census, the Government of Telangana Indicates that The hearing process is very court-like and legalistic, despite efforts to make it informal. To be accepted as Convention refugees, claimants are required to prove that they had a well-founded fear of persecution based on one of the five grounds listed in the 1951 United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees[1Because of the potentially complex legal issues involved and the need to make sure that all critical points are addressed in the BOC claimants are encouraged to seek professional counsel. Many of the respondents felt strongly that the person who is representing the claimant at the hearing must also be actively involved in preparing the claimant for the hearingWe ensure and spend countless hours ensuring support and review of documentation, psychological assessments medical reports, police reports, current country conditions specific to the claimThe respondents who felt that representation is needed at expedited process interviews posited a number of different reasons. Some felt that there is a need for someone to monitor the questions being asked, to intervene when necessary to clarify any misunderstanding that might arise, and to make sure that salient points in the claimant’s story are not overlooked. They see this role as especially important in situations where claims not accepted in the expedited process are remitted for a full hearing following the interview. When this happens, notes from the interview form part of the record at the hearing. According to these respondents, a representative is needed at the interview since most claimants would not be aware of the need to place objections or comments on the record. Other respondents noted that the presence of a representative whom the claimant knows and trusts is needed to put claimants at ease so they can function effectively at the expedited process interview.The situation with regard to post-determination options available to unsuccessful refugee claimants has changed significantly over the months that research for this study was carried out. Prior to June 28, 2002, when the IRPA came into force, any claimant whose refugee claim was rejected by the Convention Refugee Determination Division (CRDD) of the IRB could, within 15 days after receiving notice of that decision, apply to CIC to be considered for inclusion in the post-determination refugee claimants in Canada class (PDRCC— With regard to judicial review, respondents in all categories were unanimous in the view that representation by legal counsel is an absolute necessityand is reserved for members of the Law Society.https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/claim-protection-inside-canada/apply.htmlDISCLAIMERCITRN assumes no responsibility or liability for the content of this information . The information contained in this page is provided from Govt of Canada country report website and other reliable sources.The information provided is for reference purpose and does not serve as legal advice and subject to changes by Statutory bodies.ALL SOURCE OF INFORMATION HAS BEEN LINKED and is subject to Freedom of information : ACCESSING PUBLIC INFORMATION (https://www.legalline.ca/legal-answers/freedom-of-information-accessing-public-records/No information published is meant to be discriminatory prejudiced harm or constitutes a legal opinion againts any country or religion or ethnicity. We respect the privacy of our customers and help them to achive their rights.
As we are a good listener, We would love to hear your story.
Please feel free to contact us
(416) 465-1548 / (437) 247-2958
Info@citrn.ca
www.citrn.ca
658 Danforth Ave. Suite 207 Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Follow Us: